Shorebirds are a favorite category of mine and having read in advance of some of the specialty species of the area, I quickly put Hooded Plover, Red-kneed Dotterel and Australian Pied Oystercatcher on the target list.
Werribee was our preferred destination for shorebirding and it did not disappoint. An uncommon tringa (for the area) was the Wood Sandpiper [right and upper left]. Like other tringas, the resemblance to the family is evident (compare with our yellowlegs for example). Another similarity, this time to our Pectoral Sandpiper, is its old world cousin, the Sharp-tailed Sandpiper [middle and lower left].
Another visually similar sandpiper was the red-necked stint [upper right] which bears a strong resemblance to our semi-palmated sandpiper (but lacks the partially webbed feet). However, for something quite different, it was hard to beat the red-kneed dotterel [left and lower right]. These are handsome plovers, and in their breeding plumage, show very contrasting and distinctive colors. Also seen, were masked lapwing; an endemic and somewhat large shorebird with bright yellow wattles.
Perhaps the bird of the trip, for me, at least, was the hooded plover [middle and upper right]. This species is endemic to Australia, classified as Vulnerable because of a small population of 7000 that is decreasing and is highly endangered in the state of Victoria. It resembles our piping plover but with a spectacular hood and black-tipped scarlet bill. Very familiar, on the other hand, was the pied oystercatcher that is instantly recognizable as a cousin to our own.
In contrast to the dashing hooded plover, the curlew sandpiper [right and lower left] was seen in mixed flocks with some individuals showing a hint of coming into color.
The black-fronted dotterel is another attractive plover [middle and upper right] and was seen at inland freshwater. It is a common shorebird and completes the shorebird round-up of the trip.
Hooded Plover blurb at BirdLife: article
Privacy Policy
We adhere to Google standard privacy policy that can be found here https://policies.google.com/technologies/partner-sites
Friday, February 24, 2012
Birding Victoria Part I. Honeyeaters and wrens.
Invited to Australia for a friend's wedding, I was excited to see the fabled land "down under". This was my maiden trip to the Southern Hemisphere and excitement was building that virtually every bird seen would be a lifer. To ensure that most of free time was spent looking at birds rather than looking for directions, I had hired a local birding guide specializing in birds of the State of Victoria.
First stop was Serendip Sanctuary at the base of the You Yangs. This allowed me to get accustomed to the local birds. First up, was the spectacular Spotted Pardalote.
Also known as the "Diamondbird", this tiny bird is quite common but not commonly seen.
Next was another endemic -- the Crested Shriketit [middle]. This is a medium sized insectivorous bird that uses its parrot-like bill to pry for insects under the peeling bark of trees. To the right is a rufous whistler seen in the Brisbane Ranges National Park; and, in the lower left are 2 zebra finch [seen at Werribee; the male is on the lower branch; the female on the upper]; and, above them a white-browed scrubwren.
Further exploring woodland habitat, a cooperative grey fantail [center] was spied. Seen at Serendip Sanctuary was a dusky wood swallow [juvenal, bottom right] and a flycatcher [upper right]. But, the star of the show, surely, was a scarlet robin [left] that was found in dry scrubland.
Victoria, though a small state in Australia has recorded about 500 species. Dominated by the various species of Australian wrens and honeyeaters, there are, however, no woodpeckers. A fact, of course, noted by Alfred Wallace of Wallace's Line fame [link]. There are, of course whistlers; such as this golden whistler [middle and upper right], grey shrikethrush [left] and the endangered helmeted honeyeater [lower right].
A confusing converse of the helmeted is the white-eared honeyeater [right] with a black face and prominent white cheeks. A real delight was the chestnut-rumped heathwren [middle and upper left] which showed well but was somewhat ADHD.
Perhaps the commonest honeyeater, is the new holland honeyeater [right]. These were commonly seen in flocks. Another common bird is the olive-backed oriole [center] which we stumbled upon while chasing a black-faced cuckoo shrike [failed to photograph well]. More cooperative birds were the black currawong [lower left] and the red-browed finch [upper left].
Red wattlebirds [center] were also plentiful, but besides a flock of black-chinned honeyeaters [upper left], the honeyeater that stole the show was the Eastern Spinebill [right and lower left] which looks like a giant sunbird with very distinctive markings.
Perhaps the most enigmatic endemic of the trip was the Southern Emu-Wren [left]. It is so named because the tail feathers resemble those of the emu. These feathers don't form a tight tail; but rather each is an individual strand that is loosely bunched with the rest. Another endemic is the white-fronted chat [center] which was found in Werribee. The Satin Bowerbird is well known in ornithology for its courting antics involving the construction of a bower to attract the female. However, after extensive searching in the hills by Lorne [Southern Victoria] for the male, it was sighted but only the female obliged for a photograph [right].
Perhaps, second only to the Emu-Wren would be the superb fairy-wren [right]. This is not an uncommon bird and was seen both at Serendip as well as Werribee. It is a dazzler wherever it appears.
Here it is again [Center] with a juvenal spinebill [left] and a brown thornbird [right].
Useful Resources:
Birding Guide: Simon's Firetail Tours
Serendip Sanctuary: Serendip
Where to See Birds in Victoria: Book
First stop was Serendip Sanctuary at the base of the You Yangs. This allowed me to get accustomed to the local birds. First up, was the spectacular Spotted Pardalote.
Also known as the "Diamondbird", this tiny bird is quite common but not commonly seen.
Next was another endemic -- the Crested Shriketit [middle]. This is a medium sized insectivorous bird that uses its parrot-like bill to pry for insects under the peeling bark of trees. To the right is a rufous whistler seen in the Brisbane Ranges National Park; and, in the lower left are 2 zebra finch [seen at Werribee; the male is on the lower branch; the female on the upper]; and, above them a white-browed scrubwren.
Further exploring woodland habitat, a cooperative grey fantail [center] was spied. Seen at Serendip Sanctuary was a dusky wood swallow [juvenal, bottom right] and a flycatcher [upper right]. But, the star of the show, surely, was a scarlet robin [left] that was found in dry scrubland.
Victoria, though a small state in Australia has recorded about 500 species. Dominated by the various species of Australian wrens and honeyeaters, there are, however, no woodpeckers. A fact, of course, noted by Alfred Wallace of Wallace's Line fame [link]. There are, of course whistlers; such as this golden whistler [middle and upper right], grey shrikethrush [left] and the endangered helmeted honeyeater [lower right].
A confusing converse of the helmeted is the white-eared honeyeater [right] with a black face and prominent white cheeks. A real delight was the chestnut-rumped heathwren [middle and upper left] which showed well but was somewhat ADHD.
Perhaps the commonest honeyeater, is the new holland honeyeater [right]. These were commonly seen in flocks. Another common bird is the olive-backed oriole [center] which we stumbled upon while chasing a black-faced cuckoo shrike [failed to photograph well]. More cooperative birds were the black currawong [lower left] and the red-browed finch [upper left].
Red wattlebirds [center] were also plentiful, but besides a flock of black-chinned honeyeaters [upper left], the honeyeater that stole the show was the Eastern Spinebill [right and lower left] which looks like a giant sunbird with very distinctive markings.
Perhaps the most enigmatic endemic of the trip was the Southern Emu-Wren [left]. It is so named because the tail feathers resemble those of the emu. These feathers don't form a tight tail; but rather each is an individual strand that is loosely bunched with the rest. Another endemic is the white-fronted chat [center] which was found in Werribee. The Satin Bowerbird is well known in ornithology for its courting antics involving the construction of a bower to attract the female. However, after extensive searching in the hills by Lorne [Southern Victoria] for the male, it was sighted but only the female obliged for a photograph [right].
Perhaps, second only to the Emu-Wren would be the superb fairy-wren [right]. This is not an uncommon bird and was seen both at Serendip as well as Werribee. It is a dazzler wherever it appears.
Here it is again [Center] with a juvenal spinebill [left] and a brown thornbird [right].
Useful Resources:
Birding Guide: Simon's Firetail Tours
Serendip Sanctuary: Serendip
Where to See Birds in Victoria: Book
Tuesday, March 7, 2000
A Proposal for Abbreviating Bird Names: The Trinomial Shortform
Common names for birds can be lengthy to write; while there are 4-letter alpha codes for the common names (as well as 6-letter codes for their corresponding Latin names), they tend to be somewhat cryptic and unintuitive -- quick -- what species is BRBL, WTHA or RTBE?
As an alternative, the following system is proposed:
The system relies on taking the bird common name and decomposing it into all its constituent single words that can stand alone in English -- this means separating out compound words and ignoring spaces or punctuation.
The abbreviation then is formed by:
<1st 3>.<1st 3>.<initials of each remaining word>
Examples:
Brown-headed Cowbird decomposes into:
Brown headed cow bird [free standing English words]
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Ict.bro.hcb
Red-headed Woodpecker decomposes into:
Red headed wood pecker
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Pic.red.hwp
Brown-headed Nuthatch decomposes into:
Brown headed nut hatch
And, the trinomial shortfrom is Sit.bro.hnh (family Sittidae)
Osprey -- no further decompositions; it becomes:
Pan.osp (family Pandionidae)
More Examples to illustrate how this works:
Par.bla.aww == Black-and-white Warbler (family Parulidae)
Ard.yel.cnh == Yellow-crowned Night Heron (family Aredide)
Ict.red.wbb == Red-winged Blackbird (family Icteridae)
Tyr.sci.tfc == Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (family Tyrranidae)
Odo.nor.bw == Northern Bobwhite (family Odontophoridae)
Cuc.man.c ==Mangrove Cuckoo (family Cuculidae)
Tur.her.t == Hermit Thrush (family Turdidae)
Anh.Anh == Anhinga (family Anhingidae)
Acc.bal.e == Bald Eagle (family Accipitridae)
Tyt.bar.o == Barn Owl (family Tytonidae)
Str.bar.o == Barred Owl (family Strigidae)
Str.bur.o == Burrowing Owl (family Strigidae)
Ana.Gar == Garganey (family Anatidae)
Par.pra.w == Prairie Warbler (family Parulidae)
Par.pro.w == Prothonotary Warbler (family Parulidae)
The advantages are that it combines the scientific family name (which we should all be learning anyway) with a short form of the common name which tends to be more intuitive than the cryptic alpha codes. The other advantage is that the shorthand names are simpler and unambiguous (unlike the 4 letter codes). Decoding the family name also greatly narrows down the range of possibilities for the species common name.
Since the Latin family names are key to the whole scheme, it is instructive to be aware of what all 73 of them are:
These are the 73 of the 200-odd bird families found globally that we can expect to find in the US.
In normal usage, once used, in the interest of further brevity, it would be possible to omit the family name; the resulting abbreviation would not begin in title case. Eg.,:
"At the Church Rd venue, 4 Tyr.sci.tfc and 3 Tyr.wes.kb were seen. The sci.tfc were perched on the overhead wires while the wes.kb were flying back and forth between the fence and the shrubs on the other side of the road."
As an alternative, the following system is proposed:
The system relies on taking the bird common name and decomposing it into all its constituent single words that can stand alone in English -- this means separating out compound words and ignoring spaces or punctuation.
The abbreviation then is formed by:
- 1st 3 letters of the Latin family name in title case
- 1st 3 letters of the first word in the decomposed form of the common name
- The initials formed by the 1st letters of each of the remaining words in the common name
<1st 3>.<1st 3>.<initials of each remaining word>
Examples:
Brown-headed Cowbird decomposes into:
Brown headed cow bird [free standing English words]
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Ict.bro.hcb
Red-headed Woodpecker decomposes into:
Red headed wood pecker
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Pic.red.hwp
Brown-headed Nuthatch decomposes into:
Brown headed nut hatch
And, the trinomial shortfrom is Sit.bro.hnh (family Sittidae)
Osprey -- no further decompositions; it becomes:
Pan.osp (family Pandionidae)
More Examples to illustrate how this works:
Par.bla.aww == Black-and-white Warbler (family Parulidae)
Ard.yel.cnh == Yellow-crowned Night Heron (family Aredide)
Ict.red.wbb == Red-winged Blackbird (family Icteridae)
Tyr.sci.tfc == Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (family Tyrranidae)
Odo.nor.bw == Northern Bobwhite (family Odontophoridae)
Cuc.man.c ==Mangrove Cuckoo (family Cuculidae)
Tur.her.t == Hermit Thrush (family Turdidae)
Anh.Anh == Anhinga (family Anhingidae)
Acc.bal.e == Bald Eagle (family Accipitridae)
Tyt.bar.o == Barn Owl (family Tytonidae)
Str.bar.o == Barred Owl (family Strigidae)
Str.bur.o == Burrowing Owl (family Strigidae)
Ana.Gar == Garganey (family Anatidae)
Par.pra.w == Prairie Warbler (family Parulidae)
Par.pro.w == Prothonotary Warbler (family Parulidae)
The advantages are that it combines the scientific family name (which we should all be learning anyway) with a short form of the common name which tends to be more intuitive than the cryptic alpha codes. The other advantage is that the shorthand names are simpler and unambiguous (unlike the 4 letter codes). Decoding the family name also greatly narrows down the range of possibilities for the species common name.
Since the Latin family names are key to the whole scheme, it is instructive to be aware of what all 73 of them are:
| Family | 1st Three |
| Family: Accipitridae Eagles, kites and allies | Acc |
| Family: Aegithalidae Bushtits | Aeg |
| Family: Alaudidae Larks | Ala |
| Family: Alcidae Auks, murres and puffins | Alc |
| Family: Anatidae Ducks, geese, swans | Ana |
| Family: Anhingidae Darters | Anh |
| Family: Apodidae Swifts | Apo |
| Family: Aramidae Limpkins | Ara |
| Family: Ardeidae Bitterns, herons and egrets | Ard |
| Family: Bombycillidae Waxwings | Bom |
| Family: Caprimulgidae Nightjars | Cap |
| Family: Cardinalidae Cardinals, grosbeaks and allies | Car |
| Family: Cathartidae New World vultures | Cat |
| Family: Certhiidae Treecreepers | Cer |
| Family: Cerylidae Kingfishers | Cer |
| Family: Charadriidae Lapwings and plovers | Cha |
| Family: Ciconiidae Storks | Cic |
| Family: Cinclidae Dippers | Cin |
| Family: Columbidae Pigeons and doves | Col |
| Family: Corvidae Jays, crows, magpies and ravens | Cor |
| Family: Cuculidae Cuckoos, roadrunners and anis | Cuc |
| Family: Diomedeidae Albatrosses | Dio |
| Family: Emberizidae American sparrows, towhees and juncos | Emb |
| Family: Falconidae Caracaras and falcons | Fal |
| Family: Fregatidae Frigatebirds | Fre |
| Family: Fringillidae Finches | Fri |
| Family: Gaviidae Loons | Gav |
| Family: Gruidae Cranes | Gru |
| Family: Haematopodidae Oystercatchers | Hae |
| Family: Hirundinidae Swallows and martins | Hir |
| Family: Hydrobatidae Storm petrels | Hyd |
| Family: Icteridae Blackbirds, meadowlarks, cowbirds, grackles and New World orioles | Ict |
| Family: Laridae Gulls, terns and skimmers | Lar |
| Family: Mimidae Mockingbirds and thrashers | Mim |
| Family: Motacillidae Wagtails and pipits | Mot |
| Family: Odontophoridae New World quail | Odo |
| Family: Pandionidae Osprey | Pan |
| Family: Paridae Chickadees and titmice | Par |
| Family: Parulidae New World warbler | Par |
| Family: Passeridae Old World sparrows | Pas |
| Family: Pelecanidae Pelicans | Pel |
| Family: Peucedramidae Olive warbler | Peu |
| Family: Phaethontidae Tropicbirds | Pha |
| Family: Phalacrocoracidae Cormorants | Pha |
| Family: Phasianidae Partridges, grouse, turkeys and Old World quail | Pha |
| Family: Phoenicopteridae Flamingos | Pho |
| Family: Picidae Woodpeckers, sapsuckers and flickers | Pic |
| Family: Podicipedidae Grebes | Pod |
| Family: Polioptilidae Gnatcatchers | Pol |
| Family: Procellariidae Shearwaters and petrels | Pro |
| Family: Psittacidae Lorikeets, parakeets, macaws and parrots | Psi |
| Family: Ptiliogonatidae Silky flycatchers | Pti |
| Family: Pycnonotidae Bulbuls | Pyc |
| Family: Rallidae Rails, gallinules and coots | Ral |
| Family: Recurvirostridae Stilts and avocets | Rec |
| Family: Regulidae Kinglets | Reg |
| Family: Remizidae Verdin | Rem |
| Family: Scolopacidae Sandpipers and allies | Sco |
| Family: Sittidae Nuthatches | Sit |
| Family: Stercorariidae Skuas | Ste |
| Family: Strigidae True owls | Str |
| Family: Sturnidae Starlings and mynas | Stu |
| Family: Sulidae Boobies and gannets | Sul |
| Family: Sylviidae Old World warblers | Syl |
| Family: Threskiornithidae Ibises and spoonbills | Thr |
| Family: Tityridae Tityras and allies | Tit |
| Family: Trochilidae Hummingbirds | Tro |
| Family: Troglodytidae Wrens | Tro |
| Family: Trogonidae Trogons | Tro |
| Family: Turdidae Thrushes | Tur |
| Family: Tyrannidae Tyrant flycatchers | Tyr |
| Family: Tytonidae Barn Owls | Tyt |
| Family: Vireonidae Vireos | Vir |
These are the 73 of the 200-odd bird families found globally that we can expect to find in the US.
In normal usage, once used, in the interest of further brevity, it would be possible to omit the family name; the resulting abbreviation would not begin in title case. Eg.,:
"At the Church Rd venue, 4 Tyr.sci.tfc and 3 Tyr.wes.kb were seen. The sci.tfc were perched on the overhead wires while the wes.kb were flying back and forth between the fence and the shrubs on the other side of the road."
Thursday, February 10, 2000
The Digital Plume Hunter criteria for what makes a Birding Blog "good"
In the second coming of the Web (aka Web 2.0, circa 2006), internet technology became social, collaborative and democratized.
While Web 1.0 (circa 1999) was the era of "read only" and transactional websites (i.e., content and commerce); Web 2.0 allows each one of us to not only be a consumer, but also a creator of content.
This "democratization" of the Web means that we all (assuming web literacy) can be authors and influencers. How? By connecting "virtually" to people across the globe through shared interests. This is made possible by the incredible power of the Search Engine (which more often than not is going to be Google).
And, of course, a great example of Web 2.0 is the proliferation of Blogs on the Web; including, blogs about birds.
So what makes a birding blog "good"? Of course, the answer to this depends on one's subjective definition of "good", but clearly, "good" means providing content that is "useful and interesting to the birder".
With that in mind, let's make an attempt to list some characteristics of a good birding blog:
1. It should (obviously) be about birding; i.e.:
If the 6 criteria are met, there is every confidence that upon reading the blog, the reader will not only be intellectually enriched but will be left with a renewed fascination for bird species, their visual brilliance and natural history.While Web 1.0 (circa 1999) was the era of "read only" and transactional websites (i.e., content and commerce); Web 2.0 allows each one of us to not only be a consumer, but also a creator of content.
This "democratization" of the Web means that we all (assuming web literacy) can be authors and influencers. How? By connecting "virtually" to people across the globe through shared interests. This is made possible by the incredible power of the Search Engine (which more often than not is going to be Google).
And, of course, a great example of Web 2.0 is the proliferation of Blogs on the Web; including, blogs about birds.
So what makes a birding blog "good"? Of course, the answer to this depends on one's subjective definition of "good", but clearly, "good" means providing content that is "useful and interesting to the birder".
With that in mind, let's make an attempt to list some characteristics of a good birding blog:
1. It should (obviously) be about birding; i.e.:
- The finding and identification of birds
- Aids to identification of bird species
- Visual depiction of the bird ("a picture is worth a thousand words")
- Location information (unless this would jeopardize nesting or conservation)
- Directions, maps, tips and other helpful information about birding sites
- Highlighting issues which will help preserve birdlife for future generations to enjoy
- Conservation history of the species and current population trends
- Conservation status and threats affecting the species
- Through the documentation of bird behavior
- What science tells us about bird species, how they evolved and how they're classified
- Who, when and how was the bird first described to science
- The good news is that photo equipment is getting more affordable and, with proper technique, anyone can take great images
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














