Privacy Policy

We adhere to Google standard privacy policy that can be found here https://policies.google.com/technologies/partner-sites

Friday, February 24, 2012

Birding Victoria Part II. A sampling of shorebirds of the Southern Hemisphere.

Shorebirds are a favorite category of mine and having read in advance of some of the specialty species of the area, I quickly put Hooded Plover, Red-kneed Dotterel and Australian Pied Oystercatcher on the target list.


Werribee was our preferred destination for shorebirding and it did not disappoint. An uncommon tringa (for the area) was the Wood Sandpiper [right and upper left]. Like other tringas, the resemblance to the family is evident (compare with our yellowlegs for example). Another similarity, this time to our Pectoral Sandpiper, is its old world cousin, the Sharp-tailed Sandpiper [middle and lower left].


Another visually similar sandpiper was the red-necked stint [upper right] which bears a strong resemblance to our semi-palmated sandpiper (but lacks the partially webbed feet). However, for something quite different, it was hard to beat the red-kneed dotterel [left and lower right]. These are handsome plovers, and in their breeding plumage, show very contrasting and distinctive colors. Also seen, were masked lapwing; an endemic and somewhat large shorebird with bright yellow wattles.






Perhaps the bird of the trip, for me, at least, was the hooded plover [middle and upper right]. This species is endemic to Australia, classified as Vulnerable because of a small population of 7000 that is decreasing and is highly endangered in the state of Victoria. It resembles our piping plover but with a spectacular hood and black-tipped scarlet bill. Very familiar, on the other hand, was the pied oystercatcher that is instantly recognizable as a cousin to our own.


In contrast to the dashing hooded plover, the curlew sandpiper [right and lower left] was seen in mixed flocks with some individuals showing a hint of coming into color.


The black-fronted dotterel is another attractive plover [middle and upper right] and was seen at inland freshwater. It is a common shorebird and completes the shorebird round-up of the trip.

Hooded Plover blurb at BirdLife: article

Birding Victoria Part I. Honeyeaters and wrens.

Invited to Australia for a friend's wedding, I was excited to see the fabled land "down under". This was my maiden trip to the Southern Hemisphere and excitement was building that virtually every bird seen would be a lifer. To ensure that most of free time was spent looking at birds rather than looking for directions, I had hired a local birding guide specializing in birds of the State of Victoria.

First stop was Serendip Sanctuary at the base of the You Yangs. This allowed me to get accustomed to the local birds. First up, was the spectacular Spotted Pardalote.



Also known as the "Diamondbird", this tiny bird is quite common but not commonly seen.



Next was another endemic -- the Crested Shriketit [middle]. This is a medium sized insectivorous bird that uses its parrot-like bill to pry for insects under the peeling bark of trees. To the right is a rufous whistler seen in the Brisbane Ranges National Park; and, in the lower left are 2 zebra finch [seen at Werribee; the male is on the lower branch; the female on the upper]; and, above them a white-browed scrubwren.


Further exploring woodland habitat, a cooperative grey fantail [center] was spied. Seen at Serendip Sanctuary was a dusky wood swallow [juvenal, bottom right] and a flycatcher [upper right]. But, the star of the show, surely, was a scarlet robin [left] that was found in dry scrubland.


Victoria, though a small state in Australia has recorded about 500 species. Dominated by the various species of Australian wrens and honeyeaters, there are, however, no woodpeckers. A fact, of course, noted by Alfred Wallace of Wallace's Line fame [link]. There are, of course whistlers; such as this golden whistler [middle and upper right], grey shrikethrush [left] and the endangered helmeted honeyeater [lower right].


A confusing converse of the helmeted is the white-eared honeyeater [right] with a black face and prominent white cheeks. A real delight was the chestnut-rumped heathwren [middle and upper left] which showed well but was somewhat ADHD.


Perhaps the commonest honeyeater, is the new holland honeyeater [right]. These were commonly seen in flocks. Another common bird is the olive-backed oriole [center] which we stumbled upon while chasing a black-faced cuckoo shrike [failed to photograph well]. More cooperative birds were the black currawong [lower left] and the red-browed finch [upper left].


Red wattlebirds [center] were also plentiful, but besides a flock of black-chinned honeyeaters [upper left], the honeyeater that stole the show was the Eastern Spinebill [right and lower left] which looks like a giant sunbird with very distinctive markings.


Perhaps the most enigmatic endemic of the trip was the Southern Emu-Wren [left]. It is so named because the tail feathers resemble those of the emu. These feathers don't form a tight tail; but rather each is an individual strand that is loosely bunched with the rest. Another endemic is the white-fronted chat [center] which was found in Werribee. The Satin Bowerbird is well known in ornithology for its courting antics involving the construction of a bower to attract the female. However, after extensive searching in the hills by Lorne [Southern Victoria] for the male, it was sighted but only the female obliged for a photograph [right].


Perhaps, second only to the Emu-Wren would be the superb fairy-wren [right]. This is not an uncommon bird and was seen both at Serendip as well as Werribee. It is a dazzler wherever it appears.


Here it is again [Center] with a juvenal spinebill [left] and a brown thornbird [right].

Useful Resources:
Birding Guide: Simon's Firetail Tours
Serendip Sanctuary: Serendip
Where to See Birds in Victoria: Book

Tuesday, March 7, 2000

A Proposal for Abbreviating Bird Names: The Trinomial Shortform

Common names for birds can be lengthy to write; while there are 4-letter alpha codes for the common names (as well as 6-letter codes for their corresponding Latin names), they tend to be somewhat cryptic and unintuitive -- quick -- what species is BRBL, WTHA or RTBE?

As an alternative, the following system is proposed:

The system relies on taking the bird common name and decomposing it into all its constituent single words that can stand alone in English -- this means separating out compound words and ignoring spaces or punctuation.

The abbreviation then is formed by:
  1. 1st 3 letters of the Latin family name in title case
  2. 1st 3 letters of the first word in the decomposed form of the common name
  3. The initials formed by the 1st letters of each of the remaining words in the common name
In short:
<1st 3>.<1st 3>.<initials of each remaining word>

Examples:
Brown-headed Cowbird decomposes into:
Brown headed cow bird [free standing English words]
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Ict.bro.hcb

Red-headed Woodpecker decomposes into:
Red headed wood pecker 
And, the trinomial shortform becomes: Pic.red.hwp

Brown-headed Nuthatch decomposes into:
Brown headed nut hatch 
And, the trinomial shortfrom is Sit.bro.hnh (family Sittidae)

Osprey -- no further decompositions; it becomes:
Pan.osp (family Pandionidae)


More Examples to illustrate how this works:

Par.bla.aww == Black-and-white Warbler (family Parulidae)
Ard.yel.cnh == Yellow-crowned Night Heron (family Aredide)
Ict.red.wbb == Red-winged Blackbird (family Icteridae)
Tyr.sci.tfc == Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (family Tyrranidae)
Odo.nor.bw == Northern Bobwhite (family Odontophoridae)
Cuc.man.c ==Mangrove Cuckoo (family Cuculidae)
Tur.her.t == Hermit Thrush (family Turdidae)
Anh.Anh == Anhinga (family Anhingidae)
Acc.bal.e == Bald Eagle (family Accipitridae)
Tyt.bar.o == Barn Owl (family Tytonidae)
Str.bar.o == Barred Owl (family Strigidae)
Str.bur.o == Burrowing Owl (family Strigidae)
Ana.Gar == Garganey (family Anatidae)
Par.pra.w == Prairie Warbler (family Parulidae)
Par.pro.w == Prothonotary Warbler (family Parulidae)

The advantages are that it combines the scientific family name (which we should all be learning anyway) with a short form of the common name which tends to be more intuitive than the cryptic alpha codes. The other advantage is that the shorthand names are simpler and unambiguous (unlike the 4 letter codes). Decoding the family name also greatly narrows down the range of possibilities for the species common name.

Since the Latin family names are key to the whole scheme, it is instructive to be aware of what all 73 of them are:

Family1st Three
Family: Accipitridae Eagles, kites and alliesAcc
Family: Aegithalidae BushtitsAeg
Family: Alaudidae LarksAla
Family: Alcidae Auks, murres and puffinsAlc
Family: Anatidae Ducks, geese, swansAna
Family: Anhingidae DartersAnh
Family: Apodidae SwiftsApo
Family: Aramidae LimpkinsAra
Family: Ardeidae Bitterns, herons and egretsArd
Family: Bombycillidae WaxwingsBom
Family: Caprimulgidae NightjarsCap
Family: Cardinalidae Cardinals, grosbeaks and alliesCar
Family: Cathartidae New World vulturesCat
Family: Certhiidae TreecreepersCer
Family: Cerylidae KingfishersCer
Family: Charadriidae Lapwings and ploversCha
Family: Ciconiidae StorksCic
Family: Cinclidae DippersCin
Family: Columbidae Pigeons and dovesCol
Family: Corvidae Jays, crows, magpies and ravensCor
Family: Cuculidae Cuckoos, roadrunners and anisCuc
Family: Diomedeidae AlbatrossesDio
Family: Emberizidae American sparrows, towhees and juncosEmb
Family: Falconidae Caracaras and falconsFal
Family: Fregatidae FrigatebirdsFre
Family: Fringillidae FinchesFri
Family: Gaviidae LoonsGav
Family: Gruidae CranesGru
Family: Haematopodidae OystercatchersHae
Family: Hirundinidae Swallows and martinsHir
Family: Hydrobatidae Storm petrelsHyd
Family: Icteridae Blackbirds, meadowlarks, cowbirds, grackles and New World oriolesIct
Family: Laridae Gulls, terns and skimmersLar
Family: Mimidae Mockingbirds and thrashersMim
Family: Motacillidae Wagtails and pipitsMot
Family: Odontophoridae New World quailOdo
Family: Pandionidae OspreyPan
Family: Paridae Chickadees and titmicePar
Family: Parulidae New World warblerPar
Family: Passeridae Old World sparrowsPas
Family: Pelecanidae PelicansPel
Family: Peucedramidae Olive warblerPeu
Family: Phaethontidae TropicbirdsPha
Family: Phalacrocoracidae CormorantsPha
Family: Phasianidae Partridges, grouse, turkeys and Old World quailPha
Family: Phoenicopteridae FlamingosPho
Family: Picidae Woodpeckers, sapsuckers and flickersPic
Family: Podicipedidae GrebesPod
Family: Polioptilidae GnatcatchersPol
Family: Procellariidae Shearwaters and petrelsPro
Family: Psittacidae Lorikeets, parakeets, macaws and parrotsPsi
Family: Ptiliogonatidae Silky flycatchersPti
Family: Pycnonotidae BulbulsPyc
Family: Rallidae Rails, gallinules and cootsRal
Family: Recurvirostridae Stilts and avocetsRec
Family: Regulidae KingletsReg
Family: Remizidae VerdinRem
Family: Scolopacidae Sandpipers and alliesSco
Family: Sittidae NuthatchesSit
Family: Stercorariidae SkuasSte
Family: Strigidae True owlsStr
Family: Sturnidae Starlings and mynasStu
Family: Sulidae Boobies and gannetsSul
Family: Sylviidae Old World warblersSyl
Family: Threskiornithidae Ibises and spoonbillsThr
Family: Tityridae Tityras and alliesTit
Family: Trochilidae HummingbirdsTro
Family: Troglodytidae WrensTro
Family: Trogonidae TrogonsTro
Family: Turdidae ThrushesTur
Family: Tyrannidae Tyrant flycatchersTyr
Family: Tytonidae Barn OwlsTyt
Family: Vireonidae VireosVir
 

These are the 73 of the 200-odd bird families found globally that we can expect to find in the US.

In normal usage, once used, in the interest of further brevity, it would be possible to omit the family name; the resulting abbreviation would not begin in title case. Eg.,:

"At the Church Rd venue, 4 Tyr.sci.tfc and 3 Tyr.wes.kb were seen. The sci.tfc were perched on the overhead wires while the wes.kb were flying back and forth between the fence and the shrubs on the other side of the road."

Thursday, February 10, 2000

The Digital Plume Hunter criteria for what makes a Birding Blog "good"

In the second coming of the Web (aka Web 2.0, circa 2006), internet technology became social, collaborative and democratized.

While Web 1.0 (circa 1999) was the era of "read only" and transactional websites (i.e., content and commerce); Web 2.0 allows each one of us to not only be a consumer, but also a creator of content.

This "democratization" of the Web means that we all (assuming web literacy) can be authors and influencers. How? By connecting "virtually" to people across the globe through shared interests. This is made possible by the incredible power of the Search Engine (which more often than not is going to be Google).

And, of course, a great example of Web 2.0 is the proliferation of Blogs on the Web; including, blogs about birds.

So what makes a birding blog "good"? Of course, the answer to this depends on one's subjective definition of "good", but clearly, "good" means providing content that is "useful and interesting to the birder".

With that in mind, let's make an attempt to list some characteristics of a good birding blog:

1. It should (obviously) be about birding; i.e.:
  • The finding and identification of birds
    • Aids to identification of bird species
    • Visual depiction of the bird ("a picture is worth a thousand words")
    • Location information (unless this would jeopardize nesting or conservation)
    • Directions, maps, tips and other helpful information about birding sites
2. It should be about the conservation of birds and their habitat:
  •  Highlighting issues which will help preserve birdlife for future generations to enjoy
    • Conservation history of the species and current population trends
    • Conservation status and threats affecting the species
3. It should be about the natural history of birds:
  • Through the documentation of  bird behavior
4. It should be about bird science:
  • What science tells us about bird species, how they evolved and how they're classified
5. It may also offer historical insight:
  • Who, when and how was the bird first described to science
6. And, since most (if not all) birding blogs feature (digital) photographs, it may also be useful to discuss photographic technique. 
  • The good news is that photo equipment is getting more affordable and, with proper technique, anyone can take great images
If the 6 criteria are met, there is every confidence that upon reading the blog, the reader will not only be intellectually enriched but will be left with a renewed fascination for bird species, their visual brilliance and natural history.